Many of us who do not belong to a religion or do not believe in God are very worried about some of the events which are being played out each day by some people in the religious world. Some of the things occurring are minor things which we can over look, however there are certain things which cannot be over looked, because these activities actually threaten life as we know it.
From talking to many atheists I get the feeling that they do not wish to destroy religion, but instead wish to be free from its domineering nature. Sam Harris is on record as saying the problem with religious moderates is that they give cover to the extreme elements in religion, and sadly I now have to agree with him. At present rightly or wrongly it appears that in the main the only people prepared to really stand up to the extremist views in Christianity, are the atheists and the secularists.
We continually hear the call for Muslims to denounce the extremist elements in their religion, and many have been doing so for sometime now, although at times it seems their voices are purposefully ignored.
I think it is really time for the sake of this planet’s future that those who are not from the Religious Right be prepared to join forces and stand up to the Religious Right and their extreme and sometimes dangerous views.
The reason some secularists appear hostile towards Christianity at present, is because we can see the writing on the wall as the Religious Right’s power starts to have a greater influence on our politics, both on our domestic and on our foreign policies. Just as many stereotype all Muslims as terrorists, it can be just as easy to stereotype many American Christians as religious extremists.
I do notice in the comments sections of some articles written about some of those in the Religious Right, that some Christians are labelling some sections of the Right as not being a true reflection of Christianity and calling them a cult. That acknowledgement is refreshing, but it will not be enough to stand up against the very well organized Religious Right, we will need prominent lobby groups to get our message across and it will mean the joining of forces of people of religious and of non-religious backgrounds in order to make an impact.
I recently got tangled up in a discussion here at Vox, where a group of Christians were actively promoting a petition to ban Muslims from practicing Islam in this country. Some of the supporters went even further and wanted all Muslims deported from here and one wanted to go even further still and nuke Afghanistan and Pakistan and eventually destroy the religion of Islam. A couple of the people in support of the petition were hopefully acting due to fear of the unknown, so I will give them the benefit of the doubt. However I believe these views are still extreme and are definitely not a solution for peace in this country or the world.
I have decided not to protect religious extremists anymore here at Vox, but instead out them. So if anyone is interested here are the links to the posts in question: Proposed Constitutional Amendment Against Islam Post 1 and Post 2. I may actually be running the risk of promoting this petition and as a result more people may sign it, but that is the risk I am prepared to take.
One glaring thing was that only one Christian stood up and opposed this view at these posts. Perhaps those who knew about it thought it was a waste of time opposing it, as the petition wouldn’t get very far, but is it right to look the other way and say nothing, as isn’t that as good as agreeing with them. I don’t think we can afford to continue to look the other way, when our country is literally being hijacked by the Religious Right.
The other possibility is some Christians may have actually agreed with their stand, but were too afraid to say so. However to be fair there have been a number of other posts mentioning these posts and some Christians have opposed the petition on those posts.
One of the points made in the discussion of the petition against Muslims was a point which was continually made and I have seen this point made elsewhere as well, is that Christianity has the ability to reel in the rogue and extremist elements of Christianity, and adjust and contain their extremist views. But I really wonder if this is always true, because it seems to me that this is not quite true. Also when the people promoting this petition were accused of being extreme in their views, they could not see that this was so.
They cited two examples of Christians bringing other Christians into line.
The first example was WBC and it’s picketing of returned soldiers funerals. I agree that Christians have spoken out about this deplorable act. However another person challenged this argument by saying, “Yes, but where was the Christian outcry when WBC was only targeting the funerals of gay men?” To date there has not been a reply and there won’t be given the time that has elapsed.
The second example was the FLDS issue, and how the authorities in Texas had removed the children from ongoing abuse at the FLDS property in Texas and this was cited as a case of Christians bringing other Christians into line. Once again this was challenged, given that this situation is not a recent situation and I read an article yesterday which indicates that this issue had been ignored for about 50 years due to the problems authorities had with prosecuting people back in 1953. So effectively this situation has been ignored for half a century and now that some action was taken in Texas, Christians believe they can take the credit for helping to bring about this change – I am sorry I don’t think so, not if the facts about how the Texas authorities came to take action are looked at.
The massive raid on Eldorado compound was triggered by telephone calls to an abuse hot line in which a woman claimed to be an underage wife with children at the compound. Those calls are now believed to have been a hoax.
By writing this post I am not discounting the obvious fact that the extremist views of some followers of Islam are a real threat to the peace in this world, and it is a problem which needs to be addressed. But it is wrong to punish a whole people due to the actions of some. It is however our duty as Americans to reel in the rogue elements amongst ourselves, whether they be people of faith or not. Unfortunately, I do see many in the Religious Right as a danger to not only our own country, but also to the rest of the world.
Some Christians simply dismiss these Christian extremists as people without any influence and we shouldn’t take any notice of them. I disagree, when some of these people have the ear of our politicians and strongly lobby our politicians then we do have to take notice.
Obviously I cannot name all of them, but they all hang out together so that makes it rather easy.
Let’s start with pastor Rod Parsley who believes we are a “Christian Nation” who in part was formed to see the destruction of Islam. One of the things I was told at the infamous Vox post was,
“Presently, I don't see Christians invading other people's land in the name of Christianity”
Let’s quote Rod Parsley:
From his book, Silent No More in a chapter titled "Islam: The Deception of Allah," Parsley warns there is a "war between Islam and Christian civilization." Parsley does not differentiate between violent Islamic extremists and other followers of the religion. At the end of his chapter on Islam, Parsley asks, "Are we a Christian nation? I say yes." Without specifying what actions should be taken to eradicate the religion, he essentially calls for a new crusade.
Some of what he says in his book in regards to Islam is quoted in this video clip:
“Islam is an anti Christ religion that intends through violence to conquer the world. The fact is America was founded, I am going to stagger you right now, America was founded in part with the intention of seeing this false religion destroyed. Muhammad received revelations from demon spirits not from the living God. America has historically understood herself to be a bastion against Islam in the world. In fact I will tell you this I do not believe our nation can fulfill its divine purpose until we understand our historical conflict with Islam."
The final part of the clip: “We were
built for the battle, we were created for the conflict, we get off on warfare.”
Can be seen in its original context in this clip. The Commander and Chief he is referring to is
God and I am unsure if he is referring to real war or a spiritual war.
Unfortunately the person who made this clip over emphasized, “we get off on warfare” and I feel that should not have been done, but the message of Rod’s is still clear.
In Parsley’s book he also bemoans the fact that in the years after 9/11, 34,000 Americans "have become Muslim”. Maybe instead of bemoaning the fact, he should ask the question why? What is Islam offering that Christianity is not?
Testimony from a Californian lady, who was a practicing Christian and an active member in her nearby Presbyterian church, wrote in her conversion story that despite her active affiliation with the church, she always had serious questions about the fundamentals of Christianity which did not make sense to her. The church couldn't give them good answers either, they only told them to "have faith". Her questions were answered when she took a course about Islam. "This class brought back all of the concerns that I had about Christianity. As I learned about Islam, all my questions were answered. All of us are not punished for Adam's original sin. Adam asked God for forgiveness and our merciful, loving God forgave him. God doesn't require a blood sacrifice in payment for sin. We must sincerely ask for forgiveness and amend our ways. Jesus wasn't God, he was a prophet like all of the other prophets. This answered all of my questions about the trinity and the nature of Jesus. I found a teaching that put everything in its proper perspective and appealed to my heart and my intellect. It seemed natural. It wasn't confusing. I had been searching and I had found a place to rest my faith."
I am not promoting Islam as a perfect religion, but it obviously appeals too many and testimony such as this indicates that Islam is quite often spread peacefully. Islam has just as much right to exist as any other religion, and just because it does not seem compatible with Christianity due to conflicting interpretations of dogma, doesn’t make it any less legitimate. What right does a Christian have to say Christianity's view is correct and another's religion is not? I no longer believe in God, but I do not expect people to denounce their God, but I do expect them to respect my right not to believe in God. When I see truly spiritual people practice their religion in a fully compassionate and loving way, I am deeply moved and it moves my own spirit. But when I see people abuse people with their religion, I recoil in horror.
So let’s discuss Rod Parsley. Here is a prominent pastor claiming that we as a “Christian nation” should destroy the religion of Islam. This man has also endorsed a presidential candidate and the candidate has accepted his endorsement. I think this would qualify as a potential sign of a “Christian nation” supporting massive invasion and destruction of lands and people in the name of Christianity.
Another point about this situation is that it portrays a very strong message to the Islamic communities around the world, it reinforces what the likes of Osama Bin Laden has been telling Muslims, that America does want to destroy Islam. So we are playing straight into the hands of the Islamic terrorists and we are creating the potential for more terrorists to be born.
Also what is the difference between an Islamic cleric shouting, “Death to America” in the name of Islam and what Rod Parsley is shouting in the name of Christianity – NOTHING!
Also where does this attitude leave the 7 million Muslims living peacefully in this country, what sort of a terrible message is this sending to them?
One more point before I move on. America was not founded with the intention of seeing Islam destroyed. The Treaty of Tripoli indicates this.
"As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."(Musselmen means Muslim)
So as far as Parsley is concerned, I think here we have an extremist in out midst’s going virtually unchecked by mainstream Christianity. He also just happens to be a member of CUFI, along with John Hagee who must be without doubt currently the most prominent “End Timer” in our country.
So what is John Hagee and CUFI promoting? Let me see.
We should attack Iran with a preemptive nuclear strike and he quotes Biblical
verses to back his claim. His motive is so that Israel stays intact and let’s
be honest, he wants Israel intact initially so that his “End Time Prophesy” can
come true and part of the strike on Iran is to do with his prophesy. So I would
classify that as attacking a country in the name of Christianity and not
necessarily in defense.
What else does CUFI promote? It promotes that Israel should not give up any land to Palestine, even though the land in question is what is rightfully theirs as stated by UN guidelines. So rather than encouraging peace, as I would have thought most Christians would be about, he and his followers demand (Update on Annapolis Rapid Response Action Alert) that the US government not put any pressure on Israel to give up any land and their reasoning once again is purely biblical, and has to do with End Time Prophesy, as Israel must remain intact and not be divided for the prophesy to unfold as planned. So instead of promoting peace and looking out for the long term welfare of the Palestinians and the Israelis, he and his group are more interested in their own interests i.e. their version of the “End Time Prophesy”. Interesting article: 5 Myths on Who's Really 'Pro-Israel'
Here is what his followers believe, which
shows Hagee’s real intention:
Near the end of this video Hagee makes the
Jewish claim for Israel based on it being passed down through Abraham to his
son Isaac. Here is another item of
contention, as that is not how Islam sees it. Hagee ignores Abraham’s son
Ishmael who it is said that the Muslims descended from and according to Islam
the Muslims also have a right to the Holy land.
Who is right and who is wrong, well who would know, but according to the
Bible Abraham was buried and there were two mourners, Isaac and Ishmael --
together. Genesis 25. Wouldn’t it be nice for the rest of the world
if the Jews and the Muslims could share the land equally? Some of us are sick of the squabbling over
this piece of land.
The views of Hagee and CUFI which seem to be influencing our foreign policy have grave implications for the rest of the world. So I consider them extreme, as they may create a nuclear war which may destroy our planet. It is time to bring them to task. See this website for a more rational view and a starting point at tackling the Christian extremists. Challenging Christian Zionism I would also suggest the book The Left Hand of God
I have another concern about the Religious Right and
the preaching of the “End Times Prophesy” and that is the negative impact it is
having in some third world countries. Take
for instance missionary work in Uganda, here is a well meaning missionary
preaching the gospel and sadly also preaching “End Time Prophesy”. The effects
of this prophesy in a country where many have a poor life with little
opportunities results in many giving up on their future.
As a Uganda Newspaper editor Andrew Mwenda states, he is appalled by these Doomsday preachers, who he believes are converting young people and diverting them from fulfilling their potential and pursuing their careers. Instead of people coming up with man made solutions to their problems, they are turning to prayer so that the world may end quicker and their problems will be over.
Uganda Teacher Julius Othieno describes children being taken out of school as there is no point in schooling if the end is near. Children are praying all night for the end of the world and not being able to concentrate in school during the day. Also children are not taking medicine when they are ill, in order to hasten their death.
In the 1990s the Ugandan AIDS infection rate was cut from 30 to 5%, unfortunately now people are not using condoms for protection, because what is the point if the world is coming to an end, so sadly as a consequence the infection rate is once again climbing
So this type of preaching is having a severe negative impact. Therefore this situation is also something Christianity really does need to address.
I would suggest watching this documentary which looks at the negative effects of teaching End Times Prophesy.
I really have to question the real social conscience of the Religious Right when their commentators write articles such as this: “God’s Choice for President”
It is time people of all faiths and secularists joined forces and put a real social conscience back into this nation and rein in all of the extremists in this country. This nation and the world depends on it.
Comments
Heh. I love one of the lines from the article you linked: "Do your ambitions for Israel extend beyond turning it into the fuel for the fire of the "End of Days"? Then Hagee and company are not -- repeat, not -- your friends."
I simply don't understand the mentality of someone who thinks they have to help their God to fulfil biblical prophecies... Surely the whole point of a prophecy is that it tells us what will come to pass no matter what we do; acting as though we need to expedite proceedings amounts to unbelief in God's ability to get things done. A biblical prophecy that requires us to fulfil it isn't a 'prophecy' at all - it's a 'plan'. These people have a crazy, skewed theology - with horrible political consequences.
Sheri - death threats? Just disgusting.
I am with you all the way on that issue!
But people wouldn't issue death threats, that would just be un................
Yes I have noticed you around and I have gotten the feeling that you are deeply religious and I have always respected your viewpoints when I have read your comments. If you ever need some support, I am happy to be the target of the odd death threat or two, just another notch on my belt in my little crusade. I had better go and invest in that firearm I have been meaning to get :)
I fully agree with your comment to Nick. Rabbi Lerner also takes a similar line in his book, "The Left Hand of God", in that the Religious Right have been successful because in a world full of uncertainties, the RR "appears" to know all of the answers and that is comforting to many "lost souls".
In recent times I have come across some very inspirational Rabbis, who appear to follow what is the more socially conscious Jewish perspective, which I believe was originally the mainstream Jewish perspective e.g. many Jews in Europe prior to WWII were socialists. It is refreshing to see these rabbis speaking out and it has given me a renewed respect for the Jewish religious tradition.
The point you made about having so much invested in a religion or world view and then having it challenged is also a valid point. It appears to be easier to hold onto views which may be irrational, than face the reality that possibly these views could be wrong and when entire social networks are built around these views it is difficult to just walk away and start a fresh.
An example to illustrate this point would be someone who is gay and they have invested decades in the Ex-gay movement as a leader of the movement, but they start to realize their life is a sham, as they know they are still gay and are denying who they really are, but they know if they admit it to those around them then they will lose their friends, work colleagues and their whole support network. It takes great courage to take such a step.
In the odd debate I have been a part of and I have supplied factual knowledge to back up my claims, I knew the information would either be ignored or totally denied with irrational arguments. I knew that the person could not accept it, because to do so in a public forum (Vox) with their own support network around them, could put their support network in jeopardy. If your support network does not have a narrow outlook with rigid views, than a person can feel comfortable considering an alternative point of view, but if a support network doesn't give that flexibility, then it is difficult to consider an alternative view.
I know that many religious folk will not watch documentaries which may challenge their views of religion, they are just too frightened to have their view challenged. But if someone was very confident and comfortable in their views then they would have nothing to fear from watching such a documentary. It seems almost common practice for some to condemn a book, documentary etc without ever having viewed it, they are just going on what their "leaders" have said.
Yes you are right "fanaticism" is probably a better word for this extremist behavior. I have been trying to find a suitable word to describe it, thank you.
Yep they certainly do.
Nick here is an interesting take on "The Prophecy". What if the State of Israel Hagee and his followers recognize is not the true Israel according to Bible prophecy. Here is what a Jewish organization believes about the current established State of Israel. It ties in with your feelings on not forcing the hand of God, so to speak.
Jews Against Zionism: “Our belief is that the Jewish people, which has been in exile among various nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in the year 69 of the Common Era, must continue to live in exile until G-d sends us the messiah. Exile means that we may not claim any rights to the Holy Land, or make any attempts at political sovereignty. We are forbidden to wage wars against any other people. The messiah will be a prophet who performs miracles and brings all Jews to keep the Torah, and his status as the messiah will be accepted by all men. Even when the messiah comes there will be no conquest or expulsion of other peoples. All the nations will live in peace with each other and with the Jewish nation, the Jewish nation will be restored to its ancestral land, and the messiah will be their king. Jews must only wait and take no political or military action. This is not only our belief; it has always been the belief of all Jews, everywhere. Only recently, through the efforts of the Zionists, have Jews begun to forget these beliefs.”
Thanks - really interesting stuff. I remember seeing an article about Jews Against Zionism some years ago and wondering how much clout they had. It seems to me that, setting aside the question of how much political necessity there is for a State of Israel, they have a very strong theological position.
Re all these death threats... you're right that we need back each other up against bigots (we've got a pretty diverse little posse just discussing this one post alone).
Sounds like a job for you Nick :)
I am heading to Amazon now and also getting that book Sheri suggested, it definitely looks like a winner to me.
As for watching each others backs against vicious attacks, I am defintely serious on that front. I have noticed the odd bit of full scale bullying that seems to occur on some blogs when an alternative view is aired. Unfortunately I haven't been around long enough to have had much influence, but I hope to get out and about around Vox a bit more. I got seriously tied up at the petition post against Muslims, but that post seems to have finally run out of steam and I can move on.
I am not so optimistic that fanaticism can be overcome. I do not see fanatics on any side as susceptible to reason and decency. But at the same time, I know that my own pessimism accomplishes nothing. It is the optimists of history who have changed the world.
I've actually become much more moderate since becoming religious, because the thing that has been drilled into my head through experience over and over again is the raw necessity of admitting uncertainty. Over and over again, rather than finding answers, I have had to face that I do not have answers, and that there are things that make absolutely no sense within my own worldview. There is a very spiritual dimension to that.
I'm reminded of a story of Elie Wiesel. When he was in the concentration camp, a group of rabbis invited him to a trial that they were holding. They put God on trial, and found Him guilty of crimes against humanity for allowing the Holocaust to happen. After the verdict was delivered, there was a moment of silence, then one of the rabbis announced that it was time for evening prayers, and they began to say kaddish.
Jews have crazies too - just fewer of them. Because Jews make up a fraction of a percent of the world's population, and such a small group has such diverse opinions, Jewish fanatics aren't quite so visible. Don't think that Jews against Zionism are necessarily moderate. They may be affiliated with the Charedim, who are very anti-Zionist, but have their own extremists who can be very violent. Ready Haaretz or JPost for some real horror stories.
Even the term "Zionist" has a spectrum of meaning. I know a lot of avid Zionists who favor the two-state solution. They have nothing against the Palestinians - they just don't think that Israel should be wiped off the map either. A lot of the people called "Zionists" do not unconditionally support everything that the Israeli government does, nor do they think that the Palestinians are bad people, nor do they believe in a human need to fulfill prophecy. I could be labeled a Zionist in some contexts. I despise the oppression of the Palestinians, and I want very much for them to thrive and be happy, but I also believe that Israel is necessary in the world. It was started after the Holocaust when the rest of the world refused Jewish refugees. After several millenia of pogroms, inquisitions, expulsions, and attempts at genocide, I do believe that the Jewish people need a home.This has nothing to do with fulfilling prophecy, and everything to do with saving lives. But Israel's necessity for saving Jewish lives does not give it a blank check to harm the Palestinians. What we know now as "Christian Zionism" is both anti-semitic and anti-Israel. What a horrible thing, to want to bring about world annihilation! And how horribly anti-semitic to want to bring it specifically to the Jews!
There is sometimes a problem with language. My rabbi once said of the ultra-Orthodox that they do not have the same religion as he, but both are called Jews.
As to Jews and socialism, it's hard to pin down a mainstream Jewish view on any political or social issues. There's an old saying - "two Jews, three opinions." That being said, Jews have rarely benefited from the established social order, so it has been easier to be a Jewish progressive in most historical contexts.
But I'm getting way off the subject here.
I use the term "fanaticism" rather than "fundamentalism" because it is possible to be fanatical about almost any idea, whereas it is much more difficult to be a fundamentalist outside of certain concepts. There is, for example, no such thing as an animal rights fundamentalist, but the nuts going around threatening to kill researchers and blowing up buildings are certainly fanatics.
The "ex-gay" movement: oh, don't even get me started...
No not at all, I found it all very interesting reading.
I think from memory about 67% of Israelis favor viable negotiations with the Palestinians to bring about lasting peace, which flies in the face of what the Christian Zionists want. I think I have recently come across a new term in regards to Zionism to try and distinguish between Zionists and the RW Zionists. Actually I may have got that back to front, there is now a new term called Neo Zionist which would describe you and the 67% which I mentioned. As the RW Zionists have completely hijacked the word Zionist.
It probably is true that the Jews need a home, but the concept of the establishment of the State of Israel and the start of the non-Arab Jewish immigration to Palestine started a couple of decades before the Holocaust. However the inception for the establishment of the State of Israel was basically born in the late 19th Century due to a growing rise in anti-Semitism in Europe. The Holocaust certainly helped to cement the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The refusing of Jewish refugees by the rest of the world was an absolute tragedy. The turning back of the St Louis from American shores was deplorable.
I hope one day peace will come to the Israelis and the Palestinians, the world would be a much better place if it was to occur.
Ah I think I know in which direction to head. It must be a new post if I have the right blog, as I am certain the other post I saw in relation to gay rights had run out of steam.I see you found it, given some of the remarks I can understand why you have written this post.
We do everything we can over here to prevent the religious right from getting too much power in politics. Your country has given us a glaring example of what not to do. Thanks for that.
I came across a video where one of your RW people was saying you should export the gays. I tell you what, we will take your gay community and you can have our RW Christians.
Peace and goodwill
Sounds like a job for you Nick :)
I'll get right on the case!
Thanks for the invite to the group, CtianX. Re bullies: the good thing about the internet is it's harder for them to flush your head down the toilet. My personal view is that if you're unflaggingly respectful, willing to change your mind if necessary, and you get people to clearly define their terms before arguing with them, you can sally forth without fear. That said, I still feel sick every time I check my blog, just in case someone's on there kicking my arse...
Having the snot beaten out of me at karate: fine with that. Finding a snide remark on my blog: want to weep. Something is wrong there.
Anyway, I do think that people like you can and do make a real difference, and I'd be delighted to support you any way I can.
BTW, I think Sheri works for Amazon.
Sorry no can do, it wouldn't be a fair trade!
What else can you throw in to even up the deal?
Some sheep??????
Good try :)
Oh good I am not the only one who has that problem. Sometimes I write something and then wake up the next day and I am too afraid to check my emails for what I may find and wonder why I keep doing this to myself. Argghh craziness!
Let me know what you have finished that book you plan to write. If Sheri works for Amazon she may be able to find a good publisher :)
Which reminds me I forgot to order that book yesterday.
Cyber-bullies can be particularly vicious because of the anonymity involved. See John Gabriel's Greater Internet Dickwad Theory.
Note to self do not go to Amazon - it is too addictive!!!!!!!!!
Just went and discovered the theory behind cyber-bullies, yes I can see my problem.
I need to eliminate my audience!!!!!!
Now where did I put my M16 assault rifle??????????
Mormons, Reformed or not, are not Christian. Their doctrine cannot pass the test posed by the three primary Creeds all orthodox Christians profess - Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, & Protestants. The Jehovah witnesses also flunk this test, along with a slew of others claiming to be "Christian" in their group's literature. Sadly, m